Texas chaplain ban


MEGAN BASHAM, HOST: It’s Friday, the 5th day of April, 2019. Glad to have you along for today’s edition of The World and Everything in It. Good morning, I’m Megan Basham.

MARY REICHARD, HOST: And I’m Mary Reichard. First up: Texas bans chaplains from the execution chamber.

Texas did that in response to the U.S. Supreme Court halting an execution last week. Within hours of Patrick Murphy’s scheduled execution, the Supreme Court directed the Texas Departments of Corrections to treat all inmates’ religious requests in the same way.

Christian and Muslim death row inmates are accommodated.

BASHAM: But Murphy converted to Buddhism a decade ago.  He requested a Buddhist religious adviser to go with him into the death chamber. But he was denied that service on the basis that the prison system doesn’t employ Buddhist advisers.

In response to the Supreme Court’s order, the Department of Criminal Justice banned all clergy from the execution chamber.

Believe it or not, most states don’t permit clergy in the death chamber. So this change puts Texas more in line with other death penalty states. But it’s sure to face a challenge.

REICHARD: An organization that filed a friend of the court brief supporting Murphy may have helped changed minds on the high court. Luke Goodrich is senior counsel with Becket, an organization that defends the free exercise of all faiths.

GOODRICH: Texas is already accommodating multiple religions within the prison system. …So all that the plaintiffs are asking for here is that an already trained, already vetted chaplain whose already been serving in high security settings could get the additional training needed to enter the execution chamber.

Goodrich warns that violating inmates’ basic rights is a harbinger for violating everyone’s rights.

GOODRICH: So just like we don’t torture prisoners or subject them to cruel or unusual punishment, we don’t take away their religious freedom for arbitrary and unnecessary reasons.

It’s unfortunate that Texas decided it would rather provide religious freedom to nobody than to extend religious freedom to Buddhists.

And unfortunately, that’s a dynamic that we often see among governments, where if it starts to become even the least bit difficult to accommodate religious practices they’ll just try to shut them all down.

BASHAM: The Murphy case came only weeks after the Supreme Court allowed the execution of a Muslim inmate in Alabama. That state denied the man’s request for an Islamic spiritual adviser to accompany him into the execution chamber.

Some legal observers think the blow-back from that decision led to a different result in the Texas case.


(Photo/Pat Sullivan, AP file)

WORLD Radio transcripts are created on a rush deadline. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of WORLD Radio programming is the audio record.

Like this story?

To hear a lot more like it, subscribe to The World and Everything in It via iTunes, Overcast, Stitcher, or Pocket Casts.

iTunes

Free

Overcast

Free

Stitcher

Free

Pocket Casts

(Requires a fee)


2 comments on Texas chaplain ban

  1. Mathew Tubbs says:

    I am disappointed with this report, as it is more in line with articles that are against the death penalty by ignoring the other side of the story. What you missed is that there are no vetted Buddist priests in the Texas prison system, so Murphy’s spiritual adviser was not vetted. Yet Murphy was allowed to spend 40 minutes with his spiritual adviser before the stay of execution. This is not a denial of religious liberty, and the fact that it is an issue now is more of a last second issue designed to stall the execution than a religious freedom case. This issue could have been resolved long ago (the execution was scheduled in December, giving four months to act on it), but only came up at the last minute. The denial by lower courts in this case is because inmates usually file multiple appeals within 48 hours of an execution (including this case) in an often futile attempt to avoid execution.

  2. Clifton Palmer McLendon says:

    Since the criminal did not furnish his victim with a chaplain, he has no standing to expect the State to furnish a chaplain for him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.