Battling over vaccine exemptions

MARY REICHARD, HOST: Next up on The World and Everything in It: the debate over vaccinations and states that mandate them.

So far this year, about 1,000 people across half the states  contracted measles. The CDC says it’s the biggest measles outbreak in a quarter century.

Each of the 50 states require specific vaccines for school-age children. There are exemptions and they vary.

In some cases, medical exemptions. In other cases, non-medical ones, based on religion or ethical beliefs.

NICK EICHER, HOST: The three states that do not permit non-medical exemptions are California, Mississippi, and West Virginia.

Now, nearly a dozen state assemblies have proposed bills like those.

In Oregon, state lawmakers proposed a vaccine mandate bill that died in the state senate earlier this month. But exemption advocates say the fight there is not over.

WORLD Radio’s Sarah Schweinsberg has the story from Salem, Oregon.

AUDIO: [Sound of Slavic community singing hymns—”All to Jesus I surrender … All to Jesus I freely give]

SARAH SCHWEINSBERG, REPORTER: Two weeks ago, members of Oregon’s Slavic immigrant community gathered to sing hymns of thanksgiving in the state capitol rotunda. They were celebrating the defeat of House Bill 3063.

Julia Gudev is a Slavic immigrant who supports vaccine exemptions. She said this bill jeopardized her community’s right to choose what’s best for its children.

MOTHER: We and or our parents and grandparents escaped religious persecution to come for this country.  We were discriminated against… had medical procedures forced on us without our consent… We are deeply concerned… we will be forced to choose between making medical decisions based on our religious convictions or severely limiting our children from educational opportunities.

Gudev and others like her argue the government never has the right to mandate any medical intervention or procedure—including vaccines.

The bill would have removed all non-medical exemptions for children attending public or private school. It also would have made getting medical exemptions more difficult by requiring doctors to sign off on the request annually.

But those who support vaccine mandates argue measles is spreading this year because too many parents choose to exempt their children from vaccines. Nearly eight percent of Oregon kindergartners have claimed at least one vaccine exemption. So far, the state has had 14 measles cases. That’s why most Democrats and a handful of Republicans in Oregon’s state legislature say a vaccine mandate is necessary.

Republican State Representative Cheri Helt co-sponsored the bill.

HELT: We are the state’s leaders. We cannot allow these easily preventable diseases to damage the health of our children when we have the means to safely and effectively stop them.

Republican State Senator Kim Thatcher opposed the legislation. She says the debate over Oregon’s bill and others like it shouldn’t be about whether vaccines are safe. The debate should be over whether the state has the right to mandate any medical intervention—including vaccines.

THATCHER: They could move beyond vaccinations. They can move to say  you are not taking care of your child sufficiently. We need to take your child away. I think if they kept going down this path, that could very easily be a future. And not only that with vaccinations, but, anything else, adults, why stop at children?

After Oregon’s vaccine mandate bill passed the state House, it was poised to pass the Democratic controlled state Senate. Democratic Governor Kate Brown said she would sign it.

In a last ditch effort, Senate Republicans staged a walkout to stop the vaccine mandate bill along with several others they opposed. In the end, Democrats agreed to toss out the mandate bill in exchange for a large education funding increase.

Thatcher says the trade-off was worth it.

THATCHER: They’ll be back in future sessions, I’m sure. But we were able to get something.

Bob Snee is a lawyer and vaccine choice advocate with Oregonians for Medical Freedom. He says parents who support vaccine exemptions believe there is a large volume of scientific evidence backing up their choice to skip some or all vaccinations.

But he argues, even if people disagree with those arguments, they should still support everyone’s right to choose.

SNEE: It’s a fundamental right to have our bodily integrity. Now, if we’re not in charge of our own bodies and the government has the right to impose anything on us from a medical standpoint, are we slaves of the state or are we free people?

For WORLD Radio, I’m Sarah Schweinsberg reporting from Salem, Oregon.

(AP Photo/Paul Vernon) In this Friday, May 17, 2019 photo, Starr Roden, left, a registered nurse and immunization outreach coordinator with the Knox County Health Department, administers a vaccination to Jonathan Detweiler, 6, at the facility in Mount Vernon, Ohio. 

WORLD Radio transcripts are created on a rush deadline. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of WORLD Radio programming is the audio record.

Like this story?

To hear a lot more like it, subscribe to The World and Everything in It via iTunes, Overcast, Stitcher, or Pocket Casts.







Pocket Casts

(Requires a fee)

One comment on “Battling over vaccine exemptions

  1. Lynn Barton says:

    Thank you for fairly reporting on what happened in Oregon. I have been extremely disappointed in World Magazine’s coverage on the measles/vaccine issue. This is the first from World that doesn’t have me tearing my hair out in frustration and anger. There are many issues: whether the state has the right to mandate medical procedures for “the public good” (this nationwide push is about propagandizing the population to fear unvaccinated individuals, so that adult mandates will be accepted. The goal is 100% population mandated to take all vaccines. (The tiny percent of unvaccinated kids in Oregon was no reason to push such a draconian bill.) Then there is the abortion/vaccine connection. It came out of the eugenics movement and is shocking. Not two babies. Hundreds. Also the health risk of fetal DNA fragments injected into our children. Never been tested for safety. As a matter fact the lack of safety testing overall (no saline placebo controlled safety studies. None.) And the moral hazard created by immunity from liability. The schedule has quadrupled since the 1986 law granting immunity, and the combinations have never been safety tested. Then there is the smearing of parents who say their kids have been injured, and the refusal to take them seriously. Meanwhile we now have 54% of young people have a chronic condition, mostly auto immune diseases (hint: vaccines stimulate the immune system. But we aren’t supposed to look at whether they might be one of the reasons why our kids are so sick. Ditto autism.) I hope you will continue to research this issue and don’t just take what CDC says at face value. Thanks again.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.